It’s been more than a week since the end of Game of Thrones, Part I, and I’m still a little adrift at the departure of characters I’d come to think of as family. It’s a testament to George R.R. Martin and HBO, who created such a vivid world that a hole opened in our lives when it was all done.
Game of Thrones has been such a rich all-encompassing experience that I couldn’t say everything that was on my mind in my weekly recaps, which were written in a frenzy the morning after each viewing. And even with a week’s perspective, I’m not going to attempt the definitive, thumb-sucking, what-did-it-all-mean piece, many of which are available by more talented critics than I at your favorite cultural websites.
I have a more limited ambition with this final wrap-up: to make a few extraneous observations that I never managed to squeeze into my recaps:
The End of the Monoculture?
There’s been quite a bit of commentary that Sunday, May 20 might have been the last time that our nation came together to watch and comment in real time on a television show (more on that in the next point). In other words, R.I.P. to the video monoculture that began when Lucy Ricardo gave birth to Little Ricky on the old “I Love Lucy Show,” which was the first time television demonstrated its ability to command the attention of the entire population through a mere entertainment program. I can’t say it will never happen again, but I do thank HBO for holding the line against binging, which has done so much to fracture any hope of cultural unity. No Netflix show will every be able to accomplish what Game of Thrones has done because the week-to-week roll-out of a series builds a national conversation by giving podcasters, recappers, Reditters, and regular viewers a chance to spend seven days thinking about, analyzing, and arguing over what they’ve just seen. If this is the end of that 65-year run of television-driven water cooler camaraderie, I’ll miss it.
“The Big Bang Theory” Fans Just Got Screwed
Having just made a point about a monoculture moment, I’m going to contradict myself, though, and note that the idea that “Game of Thrones” generated a national conversation that classic series like “Dallas,” “Cheers,” or “Seinfeld” did is a conceit of the elite media. Over the past week I have been in many meetings or eaten many meals with people who have never watched a single episode. In fact, Game of Thrones didn’t even dominate the television set this very week! The series finale of “The Big Bang Theory” and GoT both drew about 19 million viewers. By the time all the streaming and DVR viewing is recorded, GoT might pull ahead, but “Big Bang Theory” fans are entitled to ask, “What about us is the national discourse? Don’t we count?”
The relative invisibility of the “Big Bang Theory” in the national discourse is a good example of why our culture is so at war with itself. Based on absolutely no data at all, I would wager that the audience for GoT voted overwhelmingly for Clinton while “Big Band Theory” fans voted for Trump. The blindness or even outright hostility of East Coast media companies, (i.e, the late nigh talk shows and the major opinion journals like The New Yorker, The New York Times, The Atlantic, Slate, etc.) to the tastes of Middle America has never been more apparent than in the disproportionate attention given to a show that, at best, is viewed by ten percent of the population. No wonder the press keeps getting surprised whenever there’s an election.
Also Screwed? Book Readers.
Thank God I never read any of these books because I’d be the kind of fan who is constantly complaining about the inconsistency between the written work and the TV show. But if the plot deviations are bad enough, what’s even worse for a book reader is that deep knowledge of GoT lore did not help in figuring out what was going on. This was particularly true of the prophecies. In the end, was there actually a prince who was promised? What about the Valanqar prophecy predicting Cersei’s demise? And what about all the effort that book readers put into explaining the Golden Company for the rest of us? Useless. In the end, the showrunners didn’t try to reconcile the prophesies or reward the story’s most loyal fans because they were too busy throwing unearned plot twists at the screen.
There’s Something Rotten About the Bran Betting
Why anyone would ever bet on the outcome of a television show is beyond me. Before the season started I remember looking at the odds for who would become ruler of Westerous and seeing that Bran was the favorite. Of course my attitude to that was “Huh, that’s crazy,” and yet as the season progressed, even as the idea of Bran becoming King became even MORE preposterous, the odds rose. Obviously the outcome leaked somewhere, and why not? There must have been hundreds of people who knew the outcome and all the NDAs in the world couldn’t have prevented some cheating among the gamblers.
The Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings Precedent
I think we can all agree that the ending of the series landed with a thud and the overwhelming excuse given by the show’s apologists has been, well, it’s really hard to bring a TV show to a satisfying end. Need we remind you that the very tagline for HBO is “It’s not television. Its HBO” or that plenty of TV shows had satisfying endings.
And while it might not be fair to compare Game of Thrones to Breaking Bad, I think it is fair to compare it to Harry Potter and The Lord of the Rings, two other fantasy masterpieces based on beloved books. To say, “Hold on, HP and LOTR were adapted into movies while GOT became a TV show,” is not valid ; if anything it’s damning that the showrunners had so much more time to tell the story and still ran out of time. The obvious difference is that they were adapting a book series that wasn’t completed, while the producers of the Happy Potter and LOTR movies had the authors’ complete story to work from. Part of the problem is undoubtedly a lack of storytelling skills. Part is also a lack of nerve on their part — by rights, Brienne and Jaime should have died at the battle of Winterfell but the showrunners either didn’t want to disappoint their fans by killing them or wanted to provide fan service by giving them an unneeded romance, which chewed up precious time. And also, frankly, I think the showrunners just misjudged what the fans wanted — no one really asked for “the most epic battle of all time” if that meant giving up a coherent ending.
Sansa’s the Big Winner of Game of Thrones
To be honest, I turned a little anti-Sansa this season, but I have to admit she played the game better than anyone. Way back in season one she was a callow star-struck teeny bopper who wanted nothing more than to be a great lady. And now she’s more than that — she’s actually Queen of the North. Credit to her for surviving rape, manipulation and emotional torture at the hands of the four most malign people in Westeros (Cersei, Joffrey, Ramsay Bolton and Littlefinger) and coming out on top.
Nevertheless, I still hold her partially responsible for driving Dany insane. First she gave her the cold shoulder at Winterfell even though Dany, her armies and her dragons were only there to defend Winterfell against the army of the dead. This increased Dany’s feeling of being unloved, but that was nothing compared to breaking her promise to Jon not to tell anyone about his parentage. That led directly to Varys committing treason, which was just about the final straw making her insane. So yes, Sansa was right to be skeptical about Dany, but it’s not really fair to say, “see I told you I was right,” when she was the one who pushed her over the edge.
Meanwhile her monomaniacal insistence on independence for the North is a dagger to the heart of Bran’s kingdom. Instead of being a stabilizing force, the North has set a precedent for succession and a future of rebellion. What’s to keep Dorne or the Iron Islands from insisting on their own independence? Thanks a lot Sansa.
Closed Captioning is Your Friend
By the end of the season my wife and I were watching the show on HBO Go, so we could use the closed captioning. The accents weren’t the easiest to follow and the sound editing was frequently muddied (which is kind of crazy for a show of this quality). I was worried this would make me seem old (to myself at least) but in the end, I was like, screw it – it’s more important to understand what’s happening.
Small Council Absurdity
The most ridiculous scene in the whole Game of Thrones series was the Big Council meeting at which Bran was elected King. Almost every line of dialogue could be torn apart for its absurdity within the logic of the show.
Given that it would take way too much time to dissect the Big Council meeting let’s take a look at the Small Council meeting as an example of how fan service warped the showrunners’ judgement at the end. Regrettably, this is the final time that any characters interact with each other and it leaves a sour taste to go out on (fortunately it’s followed by a six minute wordless montage of the Stark children — Jon, Arya and Sansa — walking into their new futures, which is a lot more satisfying.)
The first clue that this is fan service is the composition of the Council itself. By rights, given their experience, none of them besides Davos should even be there, but the showrunners apparently feel they must give us one more attempt at semi-humorous banter among our favorite characters — and make no mistake, everyone at the table has a devoted fan base. Otherwise how to explain Bronn as Master of Coin? If this guy can even do simple arithmetic I’d be surprised, and now he’s going to negotiating with the Iron Bank over Cersei’s debt? The absurdity is further magnified by the fact that Bronn, as Lord of Highgarden, was not even at the Big Council meeting. No, his appearance was withheld as a final gift to the viewers at the last minute.
Almost as confounding was Sam’s appointment as Grand Maester. When he left Winterfell he wasn’t even close to being a Maester but suddenly he has vaulted over all the other Maesters to be Numero Uno? And unless they’ve changed the rules, Maesters are celibate, so where does that leave Gilly and the kids?
Brienne is probably qualified to be Lord Commander of the King’s Guard but isn’t she pledged to protect Sansa? And then, of course, why does Bran make a point of noting the absence of the Master of Whisperers when he has the power to see everything that is going on in the realm?
Where’s the Human Progress?
I am not interested in watching the upcoming Game of Thrones prequel, which is purportedly set five thousand years before the events of this series. For one thing, I am too emotionally wrought up by the fates of these particular characters to get interested in a whole new set of characters with the same surnames and preoccupations.
But my real objection to the new series is that there was apparently no progress in the lives of Westerosi between the time of the new series and the one that just concluded. Are these people humans or what, because a major characteristic of the human spirit is to move forward. How can this world be stuck in the 13th Century for five millennia? Maybe it’s because there are no Protestants so no Protestant work eithic. In any event, I actually find it depressing that in the GoT universe no one except Qyburn ever invents anything and that life is one long cycle of people making the same mistakes for generations after generations after generations. I’ll eat my words if people tell me it’s good, but I will still find George R.R. Martin’s conception of the human race confounding.